Pros and cons of mandating nurses
The time taken in integrating new knowledge into practice is scary.
Another argument that has been put forth to support continuing education is that continued learning has in fact been listed on a report by the Pew Commission as one of the twenty-one competencies for current health care professionals (Bellack & O'Neill, 2000).
Moreover, subscribing to journals and purchasing teaching videos requires a lot of money.
Finally, incorporating a change, either new innovation or a way of doing things, can be expensive, since it might require the purchase of new equipment or re-training of personnel.
Mandatory Continuing Nursing Education There is a rapid expansion of techniques and knowledge in the field of health.
Researchers James Morrison, James Kelly and Carl Lindsay have approximated that the half-life of knowledge gotten in school of medicine is about 5 years.
It Shows Professionalism: As nursing practitioners, work is ever changing.
Putting these changes to the best use can only be done through dedication to learning.
Without a doubt, continuing education can enhance patient outcomes.
The current stress on competency in healthcare means that experience alone is no longer enough.
The current environment requires a constant emphasis for a nursing practitioner to constantly improve their education.
Almost every other day there are new healthcare innovations, medical breakthroughs, and threats of emerging illnesses.
For the purpose of keeping up with the new trends in the field of medicine, continuing education is important for a nursing practitioner.
Thus, in just 5 years 50% of what a physician learns in a medical school will be irrelevant.